Harrow Innovation Leadership Academy
“Workload is high and the school fails to retain staff”
The reviewer described weak preparation and direction, with heavy non-teaching duties and staff departures adding pressure.
- Tight budgets, incomplete curriculum and resources, and poorly used or deteriorating facilities impeded implementation.
- Head-office guidance was limited and leadership reactive. Pastoral duties, events and marketing competed with pedagogy; departing staff's work shifted to remaining colleagues.
- The location was distant; initial accommodation was adequate, but the reviewer wanted more separation from school.
Other context in the account
The overall package and brand's CV value were strengths.
Reported topics: workload · staff turnover
1 other report about this school
School or reporter?
Respond or request a correction.
Source
Glassdoor · Anonymous Glassdoor reviewer — head of department
Head of department · Current employee, more than one year
Displayed Glassdoor review date:
Original summary of the available public account, with a short saved quotation. The allegation has not been independently verified.
The matching January 2025 card appears below the June 2024 review at the supplied URL.
Image: Architecture MasterPrize / Aedas ↗ (third-party architecture award page; group fallback)
third-party architecture award page; group fallback
Compiled by ExpatRights ·
Location: school or source reference