Britannia International School

Baiyun, Guangzhou, Guangdong · 广州市英伦外籍人员子女学校Source date:

“… changing for the worse …”

Additional Reddit account

Reddit source ↗ · u/I_am_coward1988 · September 2026; exact day not established

Staff were informed of changes to their contract regarding the end-of-contract bonus and were told to sign a document acknowledging they had been informed. A staff member who asked for time to review the document was fired for doing so.

Several fired staff members were not offered severance, and some were threatened regarding references from the school for future job applications.

The author explicitly adds Britannia International School Guangzhou to the post and locates it in Jinshazhou, Baiyun, Guangzhou. They describe a mixture of their own and colleagues’ experiences. These selected employment allegations are unverified and are separate from the original ISR review.

Comments

She sabotages leaving staff and contacts new employers spreading lies and vitriol. - No-Emotion-2358

This sounds very consistent from what I've been hearing from Britannia international school Guangzhou. But honestly from the details I've heard, this post barely skims the tip of the iceberg. - BananaSteve51

They fired the secondary English teacher at the start of the year after they made several policies to the staff handbook, some of which affect staff pay based on KPIs (that weren't present in the contract) and made everyone sign it. He asked for a day to read through hundreds of pages of documentation was given thirty minutes to read and sign the document. He didn't sign right away and was fired the next day. - I_am_coward1988

I think the only thing British are the teachers and the curriculum. The school is ran like an American corporate nightmare. Surprise KPIs, metrics that grade teachers based on things like grades, but the same standards don't apply for everyone. Even the parents get hit with the micro transactions business model ranging from forced volunteer hours to paying for ID cards. - I_am_coward1988

There seems to be a lot of context missing here.
You’ve explained in detail how you believe you were treated, but very little about what happened on your side before those decisions were made. That makes it difficult for anyone reading this to judge the situation fairly. Some of the claims are also extremely serious, yet it isn’t always clear which events you personally witnessed, which came from other people, and which are your own interpretation.
If you’re going to name individuals and make accusations this serious, I think it’s only fair to give the full sequence of events, including your own role in what happened. There are always two sides to a workplace dispute. 👀 - AnxietyEffective3837

I think you present a very valid point and it's perfectly understandable to read this with a level of skepticism. I do believe that non of the staff are perfect, and everyone has had their fair share of incompetence.
As you may have noticed, this is a burner account. Unfortunately due to staff members both employed or previously employed having faced retaliation, I am purposely trying to keep the specific order of events and the perspective in which they are told generic to the extent where they would not incriminate any individuals.

Read more

I hope you can understand that rather than trying to paint a biased picture, it's more so out of fear due to past experiences.
If you would like to ask more details, I am happy to share.
For any new staff members looking for a more objective view on things, they should ask previous staff members why they left, who was fired and why, and compare that to the performance of staff who have stayed. - I_am_coward1988

You saying I’m painting a biased picture is actually wild, because your entire post is built on selective context. You give every detail that makes management look bad, but when it comes to what staff actually did before things reached that point, suddenly everything becomes vague. That is literally bias. You also claim you’re protecting people, yet you’ve shared enough gossip and specific situations for insiders to know exactly who you mean.

Read more

Worse, that means the wrong person could easily get accused of being involved, or even of making this post. That is reckless!
Then the head of school is being called names in the comments while you’re still trying to present this as “fair” and “objective.” If your case is really that strong, you shouldn’t need hearsay, insults, missing context and other people’s grievances to carry it. At some point, the contradictions start saying more about you than the people you’re trying to expose. - AnxietyEffective3837

I'm not saying you're painting a biased picture. I'm saying anybody is free to take what I say with a pinch of salt. This is Reddit. For all you know, this place could be paradise.
Teachers have had qualms with academic policies, been vocal about choices made by management, been late to clock in, teaching the wrong curriculum, lack of classroom decorations, poor academic performance, etc. This is public knowledge at this point. I could tell you what was public issued for why they got fired and what happened beforehand.
Anybody is free to look at this post, think I'm crazy and move on and that's fine. If you wanted to ask more about things that have happened, you're free to do so. This is more for the people thinking of working here. Go and find anyone who has left in 2026. They are plentiful and you're more likely to get something specific and useful than here. - I_am_coward1988

I do find it interesting that in several of these posts you have reiterated the “falsifying of police documents against a staff member who ALLEGEDLY assaulted another employee” yet forgot to mention that said person changed the account of events on two different occasions, also bore witness to the actual assault (because yes it did in fact happen), and got in the middle of the two people involved to break it up.

Read more

Falsifying their own statements by continually changing the facts. Police question when stories don’t align. While I agree you are entitled to your own opinion, I do believe it is as unethical and honestly quite cowardice to write such a post without having the integrity to actually tell the whole truth. There are always more sides to a story and before defending people who have left or been fired you should ask yourself if the misconduct of students rights as well as their wellbeing are more important than keeping the very people who damage that trust. - Correct_Freedom2037

I think it would be very beneficial to get more sides to these stories.
Can you provide more information on teachers who were fired in their first week? I would love to hear the other perspective on their serious misconduct that warranted dismissal before they even began meeting the students.
Have all the teachers who have been dismissed throughout the years received their compensation in accordance with the legal labour requirements? (Both local and expat staff)
Teachers aren't going to be saints and I'm not here to defend their actions.

Read more

The purpose of this post is to share how staff members have been treated. However given how much you know about the situation of the school, you are in an excellent position to provide clarity on how fair the staff are treated. Exposition on the multiple cases of unilateral contract termination experienced by over half a dozen teaching staff members would be greatly appreciated. - I_am_coward1988

School or reporter?
Respond or request a correction.

Contact ExpatRights ↗

Source

Public account; not independently verified.

International Schools Review · Anonymous ISR reviewer — review 4

Published

Event date: Not statedSource type: Public review excerpt

School identity reference ↗